|
 |
|
| Key Facts |
| Bridge Name | Facility Carried / Feature Intersected | Location | Structure Type | Construction Date and Builder/Engineer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
McDougal Line Bridge
| McDougal Line Over Government Drain Number 1 | Rural: Chatham-Kent Region, Ontario | Concrete T-Beam, Fixed | 1940 By Builder/Contractor: Unknown |
| Technical Facts |
| Main Span Length | Structure Length | Roadway Width | Main Spans |
| 34.4 Feet (10.5 Meters) | 72.2 Feet (22 Meters) | 23.6 Feet (7.2 Meters) | 2 |
This two-span structure is an excellent example of a concrete t-beam bridge in Ontario. The bridge features the railing design that is seen on standard-plan rainbow arch bridges like the Prangley Drain Bridge. It is likely that this design was a standard plan as well. This bridge is in good shape, with no posted weight limit and no major spalling noted. The bridge is situated right where McDougal Line ends at Merlin Road. This bridge features curved railings at that Merlin Road end to compliment the idea that McDougal Road ends and a driver must turn off or on at that point.
Click on a thumbnail or gallery name below to visit that particular photo gallery. If videos are available, click on a video name to view and/or download that particular video.
|
Bridge Photo-Documentation
|
A collection of overview and detail photos. This photo gallery contains a combination of Original / Full Sized photos and Mobile/Smartphone Optimized (Reduced Size) photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer |
© Copyright 2003-2013, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.
