



![]()
|
![]() |
|
| Key Facts |
| Bridge Name | Facility Carried / Feature Intersected | Location | Structure Type | Construction Date and Builder/Engineer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
M-28 Sand River Bridge
| M-28 Over Sand River | Rural: Alger County, Michigan | Concrete Rigid-Frame, Fixed | 1939 By Builder/Contractor: Alpine Excavating Company of St. Ignace, Michigan and Engineer/Design: Michigan State Highway Department |
| Technical Facts |
| Main Span Length | Structure Length | Roadway Width | Main Spans | NBI Number |
| 66 Feet (20.1 Meters) | 66 Feet (20.1 Meters) | 35 Feet (10.7 Meters) | 1 | 02102041000B010 |

This bridge is a rare, unaltered example of a concrete rigid-frame bridge in Michigan. This type of bridge which integrates the abutment to the superstructure and often displays an arched superstructure like that seen here was common for overpasses on the earliest limited access highways in the United States. Otherwise, the bridge type does not seem to have gained popularity for water crossings in the United States. This is particularly true in Michigan where the type is rare. In contrast, the neighboring province of Ontario built an enormous number of concrete rigid frame bridges from the 1930s through the 1960s for both highway overpasses and water crossings. Because Ontario used a standard railing design that is very similar to Michigan's R4 railing (as seen on the Sand River Bridge), the Sand River Bridge looks very similar to rigid-frame bridges built for water crossings in Ontario.
Information and Findings From Michigan Historic Bridge InventoryNarrative Description
Designed by MSHD engineers early in 1939, the Sand River Bridge was, from the start, regarded as a noteworthy structure. "Unique design and a tidal wave combined to make this one of the most interesting bridge projects in Michigan during the past year," stated Michigan Roads and Construction. A contract to build the bridge was awarded on April 12 to the Alpine Excavating Company of St. Ignace. The contractors began work on the substructural excavation soon after, but on June 16 a six-foot-high surge of water from Lake Superior flooded the abutment cofferdams. The MSHD project engineer reported, "contractors' plant and cofferdams are completely inundated and it is a sorry looking site." The Alpine Excavating crew worked for two weeks to repair the damage, resuming construction in early July. The Sand River Bridge was completed later that year. It has carried vehicular traffic since, first as part of M-94 and later, after a route change, M-28. It functions in place now, with the replacement of the original cable guardrail`s at the approaches with Armco as the only alteration of note. The rigid frame configuration of the Sand River Bridge represented a recent trend in bridge design for MSHD. "The so-called rigid frame design, whose good appearance and economy have recommended it to the Department's engineers, was adopted for two bridge projects during the biennium," MSHD stated in 1940. "One is a concrete bridge carrying M-94 over Sand River northwest of Deerton. The other is a combined steel and concrete structure on US-2 over the Black River near Gilchrist. The highway department began using concrete rigid frame structures for bridges and grade separations in 1935. Developed by Westchester County, New York, in the early 1920s, the concrete rigid frame bridge became especially popular for federal relief projects during the 1930s. Both picturesque and practical, the flat or elliptically arched designs appealed to proponents of highway beautification. In Michigan State Highway Department never made widespread use of concrete rigid frame bridges for its rural highway crossings. "Owing to the general unreliable stability of the soil in this state," MSHD officials reported, "very few locations have previously been found where this type of bridge could be built." Most of these locations were at urban grade separations. This bridge in Alger County is the longest of the rural rigid frame spans in Michigan. Carrying a regionally important route, the Sand River Bridge is a Significant, well-preserved example of MSHD design experimentation of the 1930s. |
![]()
Click on a thumbnail or gallery name below to visit that particular photo gallery. If videos are available, click on a video name to view and/or download that particular video.
|
2012 Bridge Photo-Documentation
Original / Full Size Photos |
A collection of overview and detail photos, taken October, 2012. For the best visual immersion and full detail, or for use as a desktop background, this gallery presents the photos for this bridge in the original digital camera resolution. |
|
2012 Bridge Photo-Documentation
Mobile Optimized Gallery |
A collection of overview and detail photos, taken October, 2012. View the photos for this bridge in a reduced size which is useful for mobile/smartphone users, modem
(dial-up) users, or those who do not wish to wait for the longer
download times of the full-size photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer (great for mobile users) by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer |
|
2003 Bridge Photo-Documentation
|
A collection of overview and detail photos, taken July 12, 2003. This photo gallery contains a combination of Original / Full Sized photos and Mobile/Smartphone Optimized (Reduced Size) photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer |

© Copyright 2003-2013, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.