


![]()
|
North Avenue Bridge |
|
| Key Facts |
| Bridge Name | Facility Carried / Feature Intersected | Location | Structure Type | Construction Date and Builder/Engineer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X |
North Avenue Bridge
| North Avenue Over North Branch Chicago River | Chicago: Cook County, Illinois | Metal Rivet-Connected Pratt Through Truss, Movable: Bascule (Fixed Trunnion) and Approach Spans: Metal Stringer (Multi-Beam), Fixed | 1907 By Builder/Contractor: American Bridge Company of New York, New York and Engineer/Design: City of Chicago |
| Technical Facts |
| Main Span Length | Structure Length | Roadway Width | Main Spans | Approach Spans | NBI Number |
| 173 Feet (52.7 Meters) | 273 Feet (83.2 Meters) | 36 Feet (11 Meters) | 1 | 4 | 16603926630 |

This bridge was one of the most important bascule bridges in
the city, since it was an example of a first generation bascule bridge, modeled
after the Cortland Street Bridge,
the first Chicago type trunnion bascule bridge ever built. The superstructure
contractor for the North Avenue Bridge was Roemheld and Gallery. The
superstructure contractor for the North Avenue Bridge was Roemheld and Gallery.
The substructure contractor was Jackson and Corbett. The American Bridge Company
fabricated the bridge.
Many bridge enthusiasts know that Chicago is the bascule bridge capital of the world. The bascule bridge type of bridge was developed there, and to this day no other city on the planet has more bascule bridges. Given this, one would think that these bridges in Chicago would be preserved and considered the pride and joy of the city. For the most part, this appears to be the case, with some exceptions. The North Avenue Bridge is one of those exceptions. One of the oldest bascule bridges in the city, and with ornate portal designs and builder plaques, city officials chose to demolish this historic bridge, wiping out a critical part of what makes Chicago the beautiful and prosperous city it is today.
In its place, city officials were excited
to be building a "suspension bridge" that they said looks like
the
Golden Gate Bridge. However, the bridge
that was constructed looks absolutely nothing like the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco.
The new bridge at North Avenue is far smaller and it has cable stays. The tower
design is completely different, and the bridge is much more plain looking
overall compared to the majestic Golden Gate Bridge. The design Chicago has come up with looks like a half cable-stayed half
suspension bridge. A few photos of this replacement bridge can be found at the
end of the HistoricBridges.org photo gallery for the bridge. Undoubtedly, the bridge is far more interesting and creative
than the typical pre-stressed concrete box beam bridge that forms the structure
for most modern crossings. However, was this bridge the appropriate thing for
Chicago? A lot of time and design effort probably went into this bridge. Time that would have
probably been
better spent planning a solution that would have preserved at least some aspects
of the historic North Avenue bascule bridge
while at the same time meeting the demands of traffic on the road. What could
have been done? A new two-lane bridge could have been built next to the historic
bridge and the historic bridge restored, forming a one-way couplet where each
bridge would serve one-way traffic. Indeed, during construction, a temporary
bridge was constructed next to the historic bridge demonstrating that enough
land was available for this preservation solution. Alternatively, if complete
removal and replacement was determined to be the best option, the trusses of the
historic bridge could have been salvaged. The new bridge could have been of a
simpler design, and then the trusses could have been placed on the bridge as a
decorative enhancement and memorial to the historic bridge. This solution would
have at least salvaged some of the original historic bridge material and kept it
visible and accessible to the public. Another problem with the replacement
bridge is the plaque. The plaque reads "First Erected 1906" and "Reconstructed
2007." While the previous bridge, the historic bascule bridge, was built in
1906, the North Avenue Bridge was "first erected" sometime before that.
For example, an 1862 annual report for the city mentions a North Avenue Bridge.

During the construction of this bridge engineers and
newspapers kept talking about how this new bridge, in their minds, looks like the Golden Gate
Bridge. It was like they were jealous of San Francisco. A great city like Chicago
need not be
jealous of San Francisco. Chicago should instead seek to continue to embrace the the
beauty and heritage of the movable bridges in
the city, which define Chicago's historic identity just like San Francisco's
Golden Gate Bridge. The North Avenue Bridge was part of what defined Chicago's unique
transportation heritage.
The North Avenue Bridge was among the oldest bascule bridges in Chicago, and was
similar to the oldest, which is
Cortland Street Bridge.
As evidence of how deep its heritage goes, consider the below photograph from
1907. Look at how different the scene around the bridge then was from what it
was today. The entire world changed around the bridge, but the bridge had
remained. The North Avenue Bridge was one of the last glimpses of Chicago's
heritage at this location.
Be sure to view the excerpts from the 1907 annual report of the department of public works. It has an interesting discussion of the bridge. The cartoon to the right and the photo below both show Fred A Busse, who was mayor at the time that this bridge was constructed.
|
City Plaque 1907FRED A BUSSE, MAYOR JOHN J. HANBERG, COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC WORKS. JOHN ERICSON, CITY ENGINEER. THOS. C. PIHLFELDT, CITY BRIDGE ENGINEER ALEXANDER VON BABO STRUCTURAL DESIGNER. |
Builder Plaque 1906CONTRACTOR FOR SUPERSTRUCTURE ROEMHELD & GALLERY CONSTRACTOR FOR SUBSTRUCTURE JACKSON & CORBETT STEEL WORK BY AMERICAN BRIDGE CO. OF NEW YORK |
Modern Non-Historic Replacement Bridge Plaque NORTH AVENUE BRIDGE
CITY OF CHICAGO RICHARD M. DALEY MAYOR DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF ENGINEERING
|
![]()
![]() |
Historic Bridges of Chicago and Cook CountyBrowse Bridges In Google MapsThis special map has bridge markers colored by bridge movable type. Complete Bridge List |
![]() |
Chicago and Cook County are home to one of the largest collections of historic bridges in the country, and no other city in the world has more movable bridges. HistoricBridges.org is proud to offer the most extensive coverage of historic Chicago bridges on the Internet.
Chicago / Cook County Bridge NewsMay-June 2012 - Click here to view the Spring 2012 Bridge Lift Schedule. The lift season is shorter this spring due to work on the Chicago Lock, but lifts will also be more frequent.
General Chicago / Cook County Bridge ResourcesView Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) Overview of Chicago Bascule Bridges (HAER Data Pages, PDF)
Chicago Loop Bridges is another website on the Internet that is a great companion to the HistoricBridges.org coverage of the 18 movable bridges within the Chicago Loop. This website includes additional information such as connections to popular culture, overview discussions and essays about Chicago's movable bridges, additional videos, and current news and events relating to the bridges.
Additional Online Articles and Resources - This page is a large gathering of interesting articles and resources that HistoricBridges.org has uncovered during research, but which were not specific to a particular bridge listing.
![]()

© Copyright 2003-2012, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.