|Bridge Name||Facility Carried / Feature Intersected||Location||Structure Type||Construction Date and Builder/Engineer|
Canal Street Railroad Bridge
Pennsylvania Railroad Bridge 458
|Railroad (Amtrak, Metra Heritage Corridor, and Metra SouthWest Service) Over South Branch Chicago River||Chicago: Cook County, Illinois||Metal 10 Panel Rivet-Connected Parker Through Truss, Movable: Vertical Lift (Span Drive)||1915 By Builder/Contractor: Pennsylvania Steel Company of Steelton, Pennsylvania and Engineer/Design: Waddell and Harrington|
|Main Span Length||Structure Length||Roadway Width||Main Spans||Approach Spans|
|272.8 Feet (83.1 Meters)||387.8 Feet (118.2 Meters)||19.5 Feet (5.9 Meters)||1||2|
This impressive vertical lift bridge was completed in 1915, and at the time had the heaviest lift span in the country, according to the Historic American Engineering Record documentation. The bridge serves a variety of trains including Metra, Amtrak, and Norfolk Southern. The bridge was originally owned by the Pennsylvania Railroad. The bridge is a vertical lift bridge built by Waddell and Harrington, an innovative and noteworthy engineering company associated with famous bridge engineer John Alexander Low Waddell. The bridge is the only such example on the Chicago River. As the only vertical lift bridge near the downtown area, it is not only historically significant, it is further imperative to preserve since it helps enrich a Chicago tour, by ensuring that all of the most common movable bridge types are around in the Chicago area for people to investigate.
The bridge provides a 130 foot clearance in the raised position. The towers are 195 feet in height. The bridge has a significant 47 degree skew. The machinery house is located on top of the truss in the center, while the bridgetender building is located directly underneath the machinery house. This bridgetender building is no longer used, and a brick structure on the ground near the bridge is the current bridgetender building.
The bridge replaced a swing bridge structure. Like many railroad bridge replacement projects, railroad traffic continued to flow over the swing bridge while the replacement bridge was being built. The lift truss span was constructed outward from the towers with the use of special falsework that angled back into the tower so that it would not be in the river obstructing boats. The bridge was also designed so that the railroad grade could be raised by up to 25 feet in the future if needed, which was one of the reasons why the vertical lift bridge type was selected, since it was found this bridge type could accommodate such a change. As built, the bridge contained 6,941,000 pounds of structural steel and machinery. An interesting design feature of the bridge was that the northern piers of the bridge were built overly wide, so that half of these piers could support half of a second vertical lift bridge, should the railroad have wished to add more trackage to the line. The diagram to the left shows how this second bridge would have been configured. As seen today, this second bridge was never built.
Ping Tom Park is a peaceful and excellent location from which to view this bridge.
Observant visitors to this bridge and many other vertical lift bridges may note unusual, massive chains hanging from the bottom of the counterweights and connected to the lift towers. The purpose of these chains may not be readily apparent, however it is actually an extremely interesting and creative use of simple physics to provide a consistent counterweight effect throughout the operation of the bridge. This bridge's lift span and counterweight is held by a system of cables, which run through a sheave or "cable drum" at the top of the towers. As the bridge raises, the cables run through the sheaves to pull the lift span up, while the counterweight receives the slack in the cable, which is pulled down by the counterweight which itself moves downward. As the bridge is lowered, the reverse happens: the cable is returned from the counterweight side to the lift span side of the sheaves, which allows the lift span to lower and the counterweight raises. These cables actually have considerable weight to them, and when the bridge is lowered, most of the weight of the cables is added to the lift span side, while when the bridge is raised, most of the weight of the cables is added to the counterweight side. This means that without something to address this changing weight distribution, the bridge is not constantly counterbalanced throughout its operation. The chain solves this problem. The chain is connected to the tower roughly halfway up the tower, and it is also connected to the counterweight. When the bridge is lowered and the counterweight raises, transferring cable weight to the lift span, the counterweight also picks up some of the chain's length, and thus some of the weight from the chain is added to the counterweight system, making up for the lost cable weight. When the bridge is raised and the counterweight lowers, receiving additional weight of the cable system, most of the length of chain is picked up and its weight held by the fixed towers, thereby removing that weight from the counterweight system.
This ingenious yet perhaps simple approach to maintaining balance of weight in vertical lift bridges was mentioned in J. A. L. Waddell's 1893 patent for a lift bridge. Waddell's design for a lift bridge in 1893 is considered the first example of a "modern" vertical lift bridge. Indeed, the general technique of using a system of chains for maintaining proper counterweight that J. A. L. Waddell claimed in his patent were still being used in bridges of more recent times, including Chicago's youngest vertical lift bridge, built in 1974. The function of the chains, called counterchains, is outlined in the 1893 patent as follows:
The lower ends of the weights are connected to the end of the span by a counter chain, composed of cast iron links, to pass beneath the inner foot of the tower and upwardly therein, the weight of the chain being such that it will
exactly counter-balance the weight of the series of cables connected therewith, while its cost is much less than would be a series of cables.
The end of the counterchain and the several series of weights are connected by eye-bolts, screwing into the bottom weight, chains, connecting the eye-bolts with a pulley, having a loop, which is connected by an open link, with the end of the cast iron counter-chain. The several groups of weights will thus distribute their power which will exert its full force in a single line of draft, and serve to nicely balance the weights of the several cables throughout their entire movement, as the counter-weight chain will follow and displace them throughout their entire movement.
Below is a diagram demonstrating the operation of these counterchains. Click on the image below to view a larger version of the diagram. Thanks are due to Jim Barker for helping to interpret the description provided in the Waddell patent.
Information and Findings From Chicago Landmarks Designation
Address: South of 19th St., East of Lumber St.
(South Branch of the Chicago River)
This Bridge Is A Designated Chicago Landmark
Historic Bridges of Chicago and Cook CountyBrowse Bridges In Google Maps
This special map has bridge markers colored by bridge movable type.
Complete Bridge List
Chicago and Cook County are home to one of the largest collections of historic bridges in the country, and no other city in the world has more movable bridges. HistoricBridges.org is proud to offer the most extensive coverage of historic Chicago bridges on the Internet.Chicago / Cook County Bridge News
July 29, 2013 - A project study has been initiated for the reconstruction of historic North Lake Shore Drive. This project puts a large number of historic bridges at risk for demolition and replacement. However, it could also be an opportunity to rehabilitate the bridges. Visit the project website.
April 30, 2013 - Illinois Landmarks has included Chicago's Bascule Bridges as one of their Top 10 Most Endangered Historic Places. View The Official Page.General Chicago / Cook County Bridge Resources
Chicago's Bridges - By Nathan Holth, author of HistoricBridges.org, this book provides a discussion of the history of Chicago's movable bridges, and includes a virtual tour discussing all movable bridges remaining in Chicago today. The book includes dozens of full color photos. Only $9.95 U.S! ($11.95 Canadian). Order Now Direct From The Publisher!
Chicago Loop Bridges - Chicago Loop Bridges is another website on the Internet that is a great companion to the HistoricBridges.org coverage of the 18 movable bridges within the Chicago Loop. This website includes additional information such as connections to popular culture, overview discussions and essays about Chicago's movable bridges, additional videos, and current news and events relating to the bridges.
Additional Online Articles and Resources - This page is a large gathering of interesting articles and resources that HistoricBridges.org has uncovered during research, but which were not specific to a particular bridge listing.
Click on a thumbnail or gallery name below to visit that particular photo gallery. If videos are available, click on a video name to view and/or download that particular video.
Original / Full Size Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. For the best visual immersion and full detail, or for use as a desktop background, this gallery presents the photos for this bridge in the original digital camera resolution.|
Mobile Optimized Gallery
|A collection of overview and detail photos. View the photos for this bridge in a reduced size which is useful for mobile/smartphone users, modem
(dial-up) users, or those who do not wish to wait for the longer
download times of the full-size photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer (great for mobile users) by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer
© Copyright 2003-2013, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.