



![]()
|
![]() |
|
| Key Facts |
| Bridge Name | Facility Carried / Feature Intersected | Location | Structure Type | Construction Date and Builder/Engineer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ponakin Bridge
| Ponakin Road Over Nashua River | Ponakin Mill: Worcester County, Massachusetts | Metal 11 Panel Pin-Connected Post Through Truss, Fixed | 1871 By Builder/Contractor: Watson Manufacturing Company of Paterson, New Jersey |
| Technical Facts |
| Rehabilitation Date | Main Span Length | Structure Length | Roadway Width | Main Spans | NBI Number |
| 1978 | 100 Feet (30.5 Meters) | 101 Feet (30.8 Meters) | 20.3 Feet (6.2 Meters) | 1 | TWN324008100 |

This bridge is one of two known Post truss bridges in the country: both are in Worcester County: the other is the Atherton Bridge. However, the Ponakin Bridge is the only one that also follows and displays the patented connection and structural details that Simeon Post filed a patent for and received in 1863. Post never did patent the actual truss configuration. As such, although each of these two bridges are among the most important truss bridges in the country, the Ponakin Bridge is slightly more significant for displaying both the truss configuration and the patented details. The Ponakin Bridge is also significant as a bridge with cast iron members, placing it in another small, elite group of historic truss bridges.
As the last remaining exact replica of the Post truss, and one of only two following the general Post configuration, with end post and top chord made of cast iron, and with excellent historic integrity despite how old it is, this bridge is truly a priceless historic artifact.
HAER thoroughly documents the unusual design, history, and details of this bridge. Be sure to look to their documentation for a complete history of the bridge.
Given a relatively higher attention given to historic bridge preservation in Massachusetts (and several other northeastern USA states) than is seen in the country as a whole, one would seem to expect to see the last Post through truss in the country restored. However, this bridge has just been abandoned and allowed to be overgrown, which is obviously better than the demolition that this bridge might have received had it been located in another state, yet a bridge this rare deserves so much more than abandonment. Rather than wait for a bad flood or a large falling tree to spell doom for this cast iron bridge, this bridge should be relocated and restored for pedestrian use. Any restoration of the bridge should be undertaken with the greatest care to retain all original material possible, and any replaced material must be exactly replicated, right down to the rivets on the bridge.
![]()
Click on a thumbnail or gallery name below to visit that particular photo gallery. If videos are available, click on a video name to view and/or download that particular video.
|
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Original / Full Size Photos |
A collection of overview and detail photos. For the best visual immersion and full detail, or for use as a desktop background, this gallery presents the photos for this bridge in the original digital camera resolution. |
|
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Mobile Optimized Gallery |
A collection of overview and detail photos. View the photos for this bridge in a reduced size which is useful for mobile/smartphone users, modem
(dial-up) users, or those who do not wish to wait for the longer
download times of the full-size photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer (great for mobile users) by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer |

© Copyright 2003-2013, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.