HistoricBridges.org Menu:
HistoricBridges.org Menu:

Divider

HistoricBridges.org: Bridge Browser

Home

Divider

Callender Road Bridge

   


Advertisements:

Callender Road Bridge
Promotions:
 

Chicago's Bridges
 

By Nathan Holth, author of HistoricBridges.org, this book provides a discussion of the history and virtual tour of Chicago's movable bridges. Dozens of photos.
 
Available Now Direct From The Publisher!

Divider

The 5th Annual Historic Bridge Weekend will be held in Iowa and organized by The BridgeHunter's Chronicles this year from August 9th through the 11th. Details are available here.



Bridge Documented: June 30, 2006

Primary Photographer(s): Nathan Holth

View Photos
and Videos
View and Link
To Maps

Key Facts
Bridge Name Facility Carried / Feature Intersected Location Structure Type Construction Date and Builder/Engineer
! Callender Road Bridge
Callender Road Over Grand River Rural: Ashtabula County, Ohio Metal 8 Panel Rivet-Connected Pratt Through Truss, Fixed and Approach Spans: Metal Through Girder, Fixed 1913 By Builder/Contractor: Massillon Bridge Company of Massillon, Ohio
Technical Facts
Main Span Length Structure Length Roadway Width Main Spans Approach Spans NBI Number
130 Feet (39.6 Meters) 253 Feet (77.1 Meters) 16 Feet (4.9 Meters) 1 2 432954

Historic Significance Rating (HSR)

View Archived National Bridge Inventory Report - Has Additional Details and Evaluation

This bridge is slated for demolition and replacement!

This beautiful bridge is a unique structure that features through plate girder approaches with a through truss main span, a very unusual combination of visually contrasted bridge types. At the same time, this span arrangement is aesthetically pleasing, with the smaller low-profile approach spans leading up to the large main span. The bridge is an example of two individually well-known structural types combined into a single structure. In addition, the main truss span is highly unusual. Although the connections are riveted, this is still a lightweight style truss bridge, using member sizes similar to those seen on pin connected structures. The bridge is also skewed, quite noticeably, which makes a bridge of this age noteworthy and uncommon. The truss span on the Callender Road bridge is similar to the truss span on the Harpersfield Bridge. Note the portal bracing design and the unusual feature of v-lacing on both the top and bottom sides of the top chord/end post. The span on Harpersfield was attributed to the Riverside Bridge Company, but it was also built in 1913, the same year as the Callender Road Bridge, in response to a flood that damaged these bridges. However, the Massillon Bridge Company was who reportedly built the Callender Road Bridge. The similarities between the bridges could indicate the county had some input on the design of the bridges despite having different builders construct them. If so, this would represent the trend that was occurring at this time to have the highway agency direct bridge companies to build bridges to the agency's design, not the company's own design. All of these significant traits of the Callender Road Bridge should be more than enough reason to preserve the bridge instead of demolishing it as the plans are now. Also, the fact that this bridge is on the Grand River, a river designated a "Wild and Scenic River" by the state should be further reason to preserve the bridge. However in the past officially designating rivers as scenic doesn't do anything for a historic bridge, and can even help condemn them, despite the fact that the bridges are an attribute for the river and heritage preservation is one of the stated goals of a Wild and Scenic River designation. See the Shanley Road Bridge for details of where a scenic river designation aided in demolition.

Information and Findings From Ohio's Historic Bridge Inventory

Setting/Context

The bridge carries a 2 lane road over a stream in a sparsely developed, rural setting.

Physical Description

The 4-span, 253'-long bridge consists of a 130'-long rivet-connected Pratt thru truss main span, two flanking 56'-long thru girder spans, and one 27'-long steel stringer span. The truss span is skewed. It is traditionally composed of built-up members and gusset plates at the panel points. The end posts are lightly composed of channels with lacing. The lower chords are back-to-back angles with battens. The bridge has a concrete deck supported on rolled stringers framed into the rolled floorbeams. The bridge is supported on concrete abutments and piers. Plumber pipe railings are set to the roadway faces of the truss lines.

Integrity

The bridge has the aspects of integrity. There is some loss of original fabric from deterioration of the steel, especially in stiffeners and web of thru girder spans at the roadway level.

Summary of Significance

The 1913 rivet-connected Pratt thru truss bridge is one of four extant examples of the design in the county that were placed to replace ones lost in a flood. All were placed in 1913, which makes them among the earliest in the state. Why there are so few riveted through truss bridges in Ohio, when the technology to do field riveting was common by 1900, is not known. The four in the county are determined to be technologically significant because they are early examples within the Ohio context. It is representative of the standard, riveted, Pratt thru-truss type/design that was popular on Ohio's roads from about 1900 to 1940. The truss superstructure is complete with the exception of some loss of fabric from corrosion. The Massillon Bridge & Structural Iron Company of Massillon, Ohio, was one of the many Ohio bridge-fabricating companies that served the regional market in steel highway bridges during the early 20th century. Its designs of this period are not distinctive in and of themselves but reflect the increasing standardization of detail that was the hallmark of rivet-connected highway truss type/design.

Pratt trusses were undoubtedly the most popular truss design of the last quarter of the 19th century and continued to be built into the 20th century, although eventually superseded in popularity by Warren trusses. The design, which initially was a combination of wood compression and iron tension members, was patented in 1844 by Thomas & Caleb Pratt. The great advantage of the Pratt over other designs was the relative ease of calculating the distribution of stresses. More significantly, it translated well into an all-metal design in lengths of less than 200'. Later post-1890 Pratt trusses show a progression toward less variation in their details such that by 1900 the design was quite formulaic with few significant differences between the designs of various builders. This marked the end of the pin-connected Pratt's technological evolution and, in fact, it was soon waning and eclipsed in the highway bridge market by more rigid, rivet-connected truss designs, particularly the Warren but also riveted Pratts. The transition to riveted connections, which happened even earlier with railroads than highways, was in no small part due to concerns about stress reversals at the pins under heavier loads and improvements in pneumatic field riveting equipment in the early 1900s. In Ohio, Pratt truss highway bridges, whether pinned or riveted, were almost always built under the auspices of counties and local units of government; the Pratt was not a standard design of the state highway department. Significant unaltered examples of riveted-connected Pratt trusses date from ca. 1900 to 1914.

The Massillon Bridge Company of Massillon, Ohio, was a prolific builder of highway truss bridges from the 1870s to 1930s, and is among the best represented of Ohio bridge fabricators in the inventory with at least 27 identified examples dating from ca. 1872 to 1913. The company remained in operation until the Great Depression, when it became a division of the Fort Pitt Bridge Works of Pittsburgh. It closed in 1943.

Justification

The bridge is one of over 40 extant riveted thru truss bridges of all designs built between 1904 and 1959. This example is representative of the population and has moderate significance. There are also many riveted thru truss bridges servicing the many rail lines in the state.

Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: Yes

Divider

Photos and Videos: Callender Road Bridge

Available Photo Galleries and Videos

Click on a thumbnail or gallery name below to visit that particular photo gallery. If videos are available, click on a video name to view and/or download that particular video.

 
View Photo Gallery Bridge Photo-Documentation
Original / Full Size Photos
A collection of overview and detail photos. For the best visual immersion and full detail, or for use as a desktop background, this gallery presents the photos for this bridge in the original digital camera resolution.
View Photo Gallery Bridge Photo-Documentation
Mobile Optimized Gallery
A collection of overview and detail photos. View the photos for this bridge in a reduced size which is useful for mobile/smartphone users, modem (dial-up) users, or those who do not wish to wait for the longer download times of the full-size photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer (great for mobile users) by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer

View and Link
To Maps

Divider
 
Home Top

Divider

About Contact Footer

© Copyright 2003-2013, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.