|Bridge Name||Facility Carried / Feature Intersected||Location||Structure Type||Construction Date and Builder/Engineer|
Main Street Bridge
||Main Street Over Scioto River||Columbus: Franklin County, Ohio||Concrete Open Spandrel Deck Arch, Fixed||1937 By Builder/Contractor: General Asphalt Paving Company and Engineer/Design: John C. Prior|
|Main Span Length||Structure Length||Roadway Width||Main Spans|
|109 Feet (33.2 Meters)||638.2 Feet (194.5 Meters)||40 Feet (12.2 Meters)||7|
This bridge was one of the first bridges ever to be photographed for this website, indeed the photos were taken before the website was even officially launched, yet for years the photos were not added to this website because it was thought that there would be time in the future to revisit the bridge in better weather and document it more completely. Alas, the years flew by without a revisit, and by the time 2009 rolled around, Columbus decided to demolish two of its greatest historic highway bridges. Therefore, Historicbridges.org has been forced to present the few dark and low-quality photos of this bridge available.
As an unfunded volunteer operation, Historicbridges.org has been faced with difficult decisions over the years. Early on in the process it was decided that when Historicbridges.org traveled out of state, a focus would be placed on photographing metal truss bridges since they tended to be the oldest, and most threatened form of historic bridges. For the most part this has been a sound plan, however, in some cases it backfires, as was the case here. Concrete arch bridges likely come in second place for most threatened, and the threat has accellerated in recent years. Today, historic bridge enthusiasts ignore concrete arch bridges at their own peril. These bridges are just as important and worthy of preservation and attention as any other historic bridge.
Of the two bridges, the Main Street Bridge was by far the most unique, beautiful, and historic bridge. With its truly unique railings unlike anything ever encountered before, this bridge had a striking appearance. The railing posts blended into the spandrels of this open-spandrel deck arch bridge, forming a beautiful bridge with a high level of aesthetic quality. Decorative accents, speaking loudly of the art deco style, added greatly to the aesthetic qualities of the bridge. There was not another concrete arch bridge quite like this one. The demolition of this bridge revealed one final beautiful secret that a restoration project could have brought back: a beautiful red brick deck underneath the asphalt overlay. Needless to say, the loss of this bridge is devastating to the historic bridge community.
Of all the bridges in Columbus, this is the one highway bridge that should have been preserved. It would have been a good compromise, with all the new bridges being built and old bridges being demolished, to at least preserve this one bridge next to its replacement for pedestrian use.
The new bridge in this place is a modern artistic style bridge, with a "defying reality" appearance that has been a commonplace in modern bridge design in Europe and Asia for years now. While it may have a striking appearance, the new bridge has no hisrtric value and does not offer Columbus the culture and heritage that a preserved historic bridge would. It remains unclear why Columbus has decided to rid its downtown of all historic highway bridges, unlike other Ohio cities like Cleveland and Cincinatti. At least one bridge... indeed this bridge... should have been set aside for preservation. Only the railroad companies give reason for bridge enthusiasts to visit downtown Columbus today, as there are several impressive railroad truss bridges downtown. It should also be noted that the replacement bridge cost a staggering $60.1 Million. The initial planned cost was $44.1 Million, but cost overuns, design changes, etc added $10 Million to the cost. One of the poor but frequent excuses for not rehabilitating historic bridges is "hidden costs." However, the fact that the replacement bridge cost $10 Million extra shows that this happens with modern bridges too. Furthermore, at $60 Million to replace the bridge it would seem that even with severe deterioration, the historic bridge could have been rehabilitated for far less than that.
Click on a thumbnail or gallery name below to visit that particular photo gallery. If videos are available, click on a video name to view and/or download that particular video.
Original / Full Size Photos
|A collection of overview and detail photos. For the best visual immersion and full detail, or for use as a desktop background, this gallery presents the photos for this bridge in the original digital camera resolution.|
Mobile Optimized Gallery
|A collection of overview and detail photos. View the photos for this bridge in a reduced size which is useful for mobile/smartphone users, modem
(dial-up) users, or those who do not wish to wait for the longer
download times of the full-size photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer (great for mobile users) by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer
© Copyright 2003-2013, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.