



![]()
|
|
|
| Key Facts |
| Bridge Name | Facility Carried / Feature Intersected | Location | Structure Type | Construction Date and Builder/Engineer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X |
Commercial Point Road Bridge
Red River Bridge | Commercial Point Road Over Scioto River | Rural: Pickaway County, Ohio | Metal 13 Panel Pin-Connected Camelback Through Truss, Fixed | 1913 By Builder/Contractor: Oregonia Bridge Company of Lebanon, Ohio |
| Technical Facts |
| Rehabilitation Date | Main Span Length | Structure Length | Roadway Width | Main Spans | NBI Number |
| 1983 | 233 Feet (71 Meters) | 710 Feet (216.4 Meters) | 17.4 Feet (5.3 Meters) | 3 | 6533159 |

This bridge is one of the most impressive examples of pin-connected construction in the state of Ohio, due to its long, multi-span configurations. Even just one of this bridge's three spans is an impressive structure in its own right, with each span around 236 feet in length and composed of thirteen panels. This bridge is a relatively late example of pin-connected technology, with a 1913 construction date, however is historically significant for its long, multi-span configuration and impressive Camelback truss configuration. The bridge features a lattice portal bracing. Lattice is also present on the underside of the top chord and end posts. There is v-lacing on the verticals and the sway bracing. This, along with its length combine to make an attractive structure that offers a magnificent "tunnel effect" when crossed. The bridge also retains its builder plaques. The bridge features unusual concrete abutments that have lines carved in them to give them the appearance of stone blocks.
This bridge however was demolished and replaced by Pickaway County in 2008. This is a poor course of action, since as evidenced by a school bus crossing the structure, it is in relatively good condition and could be restored. With an alternate non-restricted crossing two miles south of this bridge, trucks have only a short detour, a small price to pay to keep this invaluable structure around for future generations to enjoy. As a long structure, this is a bridge that is not only visually impressive, it is historically significant as well. Commercial Point Road is not an essential through route, and is simply a shortcut for locals trying to get around, a purpose that the truss bridge could continue to serve if restored. If sight distance is a concern for this long bridge, a stoplight could be installed to direct traffic automatically.
The demolition of this structure marks the loss of a beautiful and significant part of Ohio's rich transportation heritage. It also will mark yet another example of how the weak laws in the United States designed to protect historic bridge lack teeth and do not effectively protect historic bridges. Not only is this a very important bridge, it is not even in all that bad of shape, compared to many truss bridges. It is a bridge that deserves to be rehabilitated.
Information and Findings From Ohio's Historic Bridge InventorySetting/Context The bridge carries a 2 lane road over a stream in a rural area of active farms. At the west end of the bridge are woods and fields. At the east end of the bridge are a hazardous waste site and scattered 20th-century residences. Physical Description The 3 span, 710'-long, pin-connected Camelback thru truss bridge is traditionally composed of built-up compression members and eyebar tension members. It is supported on concrete abutments and piers. Integrity Rehabilitated, 1984. Floorbeams strengthened with coverplate. Deck replaced. Summary of Significance The 1914 Camelback thru truss bridge built by the
Oregonia Bridge Co. is a complete and long-span example of its
type/design. The 1983-84 rehabilitation project did not result in an
adverse effect. The eligible recommendation of the prior inventory
remains appropriate. Justification The pin connected thru truss bridge is one of 13 extant examples of bridges with polygonal upper chords and/or subdivided panels in the state that date from 1888 until 1923. It is of moderate significance given that the numbers in the population. Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: Yes |
![]()
Click on a thumbnail or gallery name below to visit that particular photo gallery. If videos are available, click on a video name to view and/or download that particular video.
|
Original / Full Size Gallery
Original / Full Size Photos |
For the best visual immersion and full detail, or for use as a desktop background, this gallery presents selected overview and detail photos for this bridge in the original digital camera resolution. For the best visual immersion and full detail, or for use as a desktop background, this gallery presents the photos for this bridge in the original digital camera resolution. |
|
Structure Overview
Mobile Optimized Gallery |
A collection of overview photos that show the bridge as a whole and general areas of the bridge. View the photos for this bridge in a reduced size which is useful for mobile/smartphone users, modem
(dial-up) users, or those who do not wish to wait for the longer
download times of the full-size photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer (great for mobile users) by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer |
|
Structure Details
Mobile Optimized Gallery |
A collection of detail photos that document the parts, construction, and condition of the bridge. View the photos for this bridge in a reduced size which is useful for mobile/smartphone users, modem
(dial-up) users, or those who do not wish to wait for the longer
download times of the full-size photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer (great for mobile users) by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer |

© Copyright 2003-2013, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.