



![]()
|
![]() |
|
| Key Facts |
| Bridge Name | Facility Carried / Feature Intersected | Location | Structure Type | Construction Date and Builder/Engineer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pancake Clarkson Road Bridge
| Pancake Clarkson Road (TR-1031) Over North Fork Little Beaver Creek | Rural: Columbiana County, Ohio | Metal 9 Panel Pin-Connected Pratt Through Truss, Fixed | 1893 By Builder/Contractor: Penn Bridge Company of Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania |
| Technical Facts |
| Rehabilitation Date | Main Span Length | Structure Length | Roadway Width | Main Spans | NBI Number |
| 2008 | 139 Feet (42.4 Meters) | 142 Feet (43.3 Meters) | 12.8 Feet (3.9 Meters) | 1 | 1538209 |

For a pin connected Pratt through truss bridge, this structure has a substantial span length. Its long length, which usually results in higher trusses, combine with a narrow deck width to give the bridge a tall feeling. This bridge is composed of nine panels yielding a total structure length of 142 feet. Although the builder plaque obviously was stolen, the Penn Bridge Company is clearly associated with this bridge. The Penn Bridge Company was a company that really took aesthetic design of its bridges right down to the tiniest detail. Their bridges often feature little medallion-like motifs on the portal bracing that feature various figures or designs or say "PENN" on them. This bridge has those decorations, and in addition, those motifs even appear on the railings!
Information and Findings From Ohio's Historic Bridge InventorySetting/Context The bridge carries a 1 lane road over a stream in a sparsely developed, rural setting. Physical Description The 1 span, 142'-long, pin-connected Pratt thru truss bridge has built-up compression members and eyebar tension members. It has lattice portal bracing with decorative builders plaques atop the portals. Summary of Significance The 1893 truss bridge, which is among the early and
technologically significant surviving examples of its type/design in the
state, has been determined eligible as the result of advancing a
rehabilitation project (SHPO letter, 5/21/08). Justification The bridge is one of over 150 extant pin-connected truss bridges dating from 1874 for pony trusses and 1876 for thru trusses. Twenty six predate 1888 and represent the era of experimentation that evolved into standardized designs by about 1888. This example has moderate significance because the genre and the fabricator are so well represented in Ohio. Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: Yes |
![]()
Click on a thumbnail or gallery name below to visit that particular photo gallery. If videos are available, click on a video name to view and/or download that particular video.
|
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Original / Full Size Photos |
A collection of overview and detail photos. For the best visual immersion and full detail, or for use as a desktop background, this gallery presents the photos for this bridge in the original digital camera resolution. |
|
Bridge Photo-Documentation
Mobile Optimized Gallery |
A collection of overview and detail photos. View the photos for this bridge in a reduced size which is useful for mobile/smartphone users, modem
(dial-up) users, or those who do not wish to wait for the longer
download times of the full-size photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer (great for mobile users) by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer |

© Copyright 2003-2013, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.