|Bridge Name||Facility Carried / Feature Intersected||Location||Structure Type||Construction Date and Builder/Engineer|
Smithton High-Level Bridge
||I-70 Over Youghiogheny River||Near Smithton: Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania||Metal Continuous Rivet-Connected Warren Deck Truss, Fixed and Approach Spans: Metal 6 Panel Rivet-Connected Warren Deck Truss, Fixed||1956 By Builder/Contractor: Unknown|
|Rehabilitation Date||Main Span Length||Structure Length||Roadway Width||Main Spans||Approach Spans||NBI Number|
|2002||288 Feet (87.8 Meters)||1355 Feet (413 Meters)||64 Feet (19.5 Meters)||3||5||640070047400000|
This bridge features 3 main spans that are a continuous deck truss following the Warren truss configuration. The end spans of the continuous sections are 216 feet, with the large center span over the river measures 288 feet. The remaining three main spans are simple 151.5 foot deck truss spans (which are 30 feet deep), also following the Warren truss configuration. Approach spans include a steel stringer span and a deck girder span.
This is an impressive bridge to view from below, and although it is a relatively late example of a continuous truss bridge, it should still be considered to have some historic value. The built-up members on this bridge have much more v-lacing and lattice than one would expect from a mid 1950s bridge.
The bridge was rehabilitated (highly unusual for PennDOT), during which many rivets were replaced with bolts, and the deck was widened.
Information and Findings From Pennsylvania's Historic Bridge Inventory
Discussion of Bridge
The 8 span, 1,355' long Smithton Bridge built in 1956 consists of from the south a 52'-long, built up steel stringer span, a 3 span continuous Warren with verticals deck truss (1 @ 216', 1 @ 288', 1 @ 216'), 3 simply supported Warren with verticals deck truss spans (3 @ 151'-5") and a 100' deck girder span. The continuous truss spans are deepest over the bearings where the negative moment is greatest. Cantilevered deck sections are supported on built up brackets. The substructure consists of concrete abutments and column and cap beam bents. The engineering principals of continuous design were known and used since the late 19th century, but it did not become common until after World War II in Pennsylvania. This bridge is large, but it is a late example, and it has no innovative or distinctive details. It also uses common technologies. Neither the bridge nor its setting are historically or technologically significant.
Discussion of Surrounding Area
The viaduct carries a 4 lane, barrier divided highway and shoulders over 2 active CSXT railroad tracks (formerly B&O Railroad), which are also used by Amtrak on its Pittsburgh to Washington mainline; the Youghiogheny River, and a local road. On the river's west bank is the abandoned P&LE RR right of way. The setting is predominantly suburban, post-World War II residences. The area does not appear to have historic district potential. I 70, a second generation limited access highway in Pennsylvania, is not considered to be historically significant.
Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: No
Click on a thumbnail or gallery name below to visit that particular photo gallery. If videos are available, click on a video name to view and/or download that particular video.
||A collection of overview and detail photos. This photo gallery contains a combination of Original / Full Sized photos and Mobile/Smartphone Optimized (Reduced Size) photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer
© Copyright 2003-2013, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.