



![]()
|
![]() |
|
| Key Facts |
| Bridge Name | Facility Carried / Feature Intersected | Location | Structure Type | Construction Date and Builder/Engineer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blackfriars Street Bridge
| Blackfriars Street Over North Branch Thames River | London: Middlesex County, Ontario | Metal 16 Panel Bowstring Through Truss, Fixed | 1875 By Builder/Contractor: Wrought Iron Bridge Company of Canton, Ohio |
| Technical Facts |
| Main Span Length | Structure Length | Main Spans |
| 225 Feet (68.58 Meters) | 225 Feet (68.58 Meters) | 1 |

This bridge is a through bowstring truss bridge, built in
1875. The bridge was a Wrought Iron Bridge Company bridge, as indicated from
this document from a catalogue produced by the bridge
company. A
plaque in London next to the
King Street Bridge credits Isaac Crouse as being the contractor for the
bridge. Isaac Crouse apparently purchased the bridge
from Wrought Iron Bridge Company, and then erected it himself in London. The
bowstring features Keystone columns form the top chord of the
bridge. There is extensive v-lacing and lattice on the bridge. A sidewalk is on
the south side of the bridge, and appears to be original.
Not only is this bridge London's oldest iron bridge, this was also its first iron bridge when it was built way back in 1875! This is the only surviving iron bowstring known in Ontario, and indeed all of Canada. There are still a small number remaining in the United States, with the longest United States single bowstring span being a bowstring in Mankato, Minnesota, of 190 feet (57.9 meters). The Blackfriars Bridge's span rings in at a considerably larger 225 feet (68.58 meters)! For this reason, Blackfriars Bridge appears to be the longest remaining iron bowstring span in North America and perhaps beyond.
The bridge has undergone numerous repairs, resulting in significant alterations to the original design of the bridge, which has had a detrimental effect on the bridges historic integrity. The most significant alterations include welded plate added to the sides of the Keystone column top chord, which has obscured the trademark Keystone column shape. This document illustrates how the plates are welded on, and what the original Keystone columns would look like as originally created by the iron mill. A number of vertical and diagonal members have had members added and welded to the original members. These added members are also welded to added plate at connection points. A couple added bars of steel run lengthwise through the middle of the truss webs also. Regardless of these alterations, the bridge still manages to be a nationally significant historic structure because it is so rare and old. Additionally, despite the aforementioned alterations, it in contrast retains some original elements that are often lost on old bridges, particularly the original floorbeams. These unique fishbelly style built-up floorbeams have an unusual asymmetrical design that accommodates an extension of the floorbeams beyond the roadway on one side to support the cantilevered sidewalk on the south side of the bridge. Also, the original ornamental lattice railings remain on the sidewalk, albeit with a metal pole welded on above them.
Above: View of the bridge in 1967. In this photo, the added piece of steel that runs through the truss in a crooked arch shape is visible. Thus, it is clear that this alteration is older than 1967. Photo Courtesy: City of London.
Bowstring truss bridges, sometimes called bowstring truss-arch bridges because they also incorporate design aspects of an arch bridge, are one of the rarest types of bridge, with most date in the 1870s. They were the first type of metal bridge to be used and gain popularity in North America, and could be said to be responsible for the transition from wood to metal as a primary bridge material. Built in this early metal bridge era, bowstring truss bridges often display patented and/or experimental designs developed by the particular builder of each bridge. They rapidly fell out of favor after the 1870s as the simpler pin-connected Pratt truss was developed and embraced, which also brought an end to the broad design experimentation as well. Between their age, lightweight design, and relatively short period in which they were being built, very few bowstring truss bridges survive in North America today. Aside from their historic significance, a bowstring bridge like Blackfriars Bridge also has a great deal of aesthetic value. The bridge's numerous members, which are also often built-up beams with patterns of lattice and v-lacing on them, form a complex geometric art. This large amount of complexity is balanced out by the simple, graceful appearance of the arched top chord. The result is a bridge with incomparable beauty and appeal that is unrivaled by any modern bridge type.
Above: Historical photos of the bridge. Courtesy: City of London
In addition to the substantial repairs made in past years to the superstructure, this bridge has also been maintained through small repair projects that are undertaken on an as-needed basis. For example, in 2006, the bridge was closed for selected repairs to the timber deck. The time may come in the future however when a more extensive project is needed to prepare the bridge for another century of use. At that time, HistoricBridges.org would recommend a comprehensive in-kind restoration. An in-kind restoration would replace beyond-repair parts of the bridge with exact replicas. Failed rivets would be replaced with failed rivets. Any of the cast iron details on the railing or connection points that are failed or missing would also be replicated. It may also be possible to remove some of the more unsightly alterations on the bridge and either leave them off, or replace them with something less noticeable. For example, some of the added welded plate connections are more bulky in appearance than they likely need to be. The decision on whether an alteration could be left off or needed to be replaced with something else would depend on the load limit needs for the bridge, and what purpose the alterations serve. If the alterations were meant to address loss of strength due to deteriorated original material, the restoration of the original material may render the alteration unnecessary. If the alterations were intended to increase the load capacity of the bridge beyond original design capacity, they would need to be substituted with something else, assuming this loading was to be maintained. One idea to consider would be to restore the bridge, but to turn it into a non-motorized crossing and not allow vehicular traffic on the bridge any more. This could decrease the live load requirements, and thus eliminate the need for the alterations.
Long story short, the technology exists to take this bridge and bring it back to nearly the exact appearance it had when erected in 1875, and to do so while maintaining the majority of original material on the bridge. To see what a bowstring bridge of this design looked like without alterations on it, see this unaltered bridge in Iowa.. Also below is a photo showing the Blackfriars Street Bridge in its earlier years before alteration. Presumably the photo was taken before 1900 because a metal truss seen in the distance in the above 1900 photo is not visible in the photo below. Photo Courtesy: Ivey Family London Room, London Public Library, London, Ontario, Canada
Information and Findings From Canada's Historic PlacesDescription of Historic Place The Blackfriars Bridge, a reinforced wrought-iron
bowstring bridge, was constructed in 1875. It spans the North Branch of
the Thames River, on Blackfriars Street, in the City of London. Heritage Value The Blackfriars Bridge is a landmark, in the City of
London, and has been a source of inspiration to local artists, writers,
photographers, and historians for many years. The gentle curve of Ridout
Street onto the east side entrance of the bridge augments the
experimental qualities inherent in the structure, including its narrow
width, the texture of the wooden deck and the streamlined elegance of
its bowed profile. These characteristics and the steep, well-treed
riverbanks and parkland create a rural feel in this downtown location. Character-Defining Elements ChCharacter defining elements that contribute to the
heritage value of the Blackfriars Bridge include its: HeHeritage Designation and Type: Yes, Municipal Heritage Designation (Part IV) |
![]()
Click on a thumbnail or gallery name below to visit that particular photo gallery. If videos are available, click on a video name to view and/or download that particular video.
|
Structure Overview
Original / Full Size Photos |
A collection of overview photos that show the bridge as a whole and general areas of the bridge. For the best visual immersion and full detail, or for use as a desktop background, this gallery presents the photos for this bridge in the original digital camera resolution. |
|
Structure Details
Original / Full Size Photos |
A collection of detail photos that document the parts, construction, and condition of the bridge. For the best visual immersion and full detail, or for use as a desktop background, this gallery presents the photos for this bridge in the original digital camera resolution. |
|
Structure Overview
Mobile Optimized Gallery |
A collection of overview photos that show the bridge as a whole and general areas of the bridge. View the photos for this bridge in a reduced size which is useful for mobile/smartphone users, modem
(dial-up) users, or those who do not wish to wait for the longer
download times of the full-size photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer (great for mobile users) by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer |
|
Structure Details
Mobile Optimized Gallery |
A collection of detail photos that document the parts, construction, and condition of the bridge. View the photos for this bridge in a reduced size which is useful for mobile/smartphone users, modem
(dial-up) users, or those who do not wish to wait for the longer
download times of the full-size photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer (great for mobile users) by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer |

© Copyright 2003-2013, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.