



![]()
|
|
|
| Key Facts |
| Bridge Name | Facility Carried / Feature Intersected | Location | Structure Type | Construction Date and Builder/Engineer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Martin Road Bridge
Valley Mills Bridge | Martin Road Over Shiawassee River | Rural: Shiawassee County, Michigan | Metal 9 Panel Pin-Connected Pratt Through Truss, Fixed | 1885 By Builder/Contractor: Mount Vernon Bridge Company of Mount Vernon, Ohio |
| Technical Facts |
| Main Span Length | Structure Length | Roadway Width | Main Spans | NBI Number |
| 114.8 Feet (35 Meters) | 118.8 Feet (36.2 Meters) | 15 Feet (4.6 Meters) | 1 | 76304H00003B010 |


This nine-panel pin-connected Pratt through truss bridge is one of the oldest surviving metal bridges in Michigan, and is the only example of a bridge built by Mount Vernon Bridge Company in left in Michigan. It is also one of the oldest surviving example's of the company's work in the country. Most surviving Mount Vernon Bridge Company bridges are from the 20th Century. Perhaps the most distinguishing and significant feature of the bridge is its nearly complete lack of alteration: its trusses have near-perfect historic integrity, displaying the same appearance, materials, and design it displayed on the day it was built. Even the railings on the bridge, composed of two angles and among the smallest railings ever encountered, remain in place on the bridge with only a couple sections missing. The trusses themselves display remarkably little section loss and pack rust, meaning that not only has nothing been replaced on the bridge, the original parts that remain are in decent condition such that a restoration project for this bridge would not require the replacement of original material. The bridge also displays built-up floorbeams that are uncommon because among built-up floorbeams the beams are fairly shallow, and one might have expected to have simply seen rolled i-beams for floorbeams of this depth. This is further evidence of the bridge's old construction date. The bridge's lateral bracing connection to the struts and the strut connections to the top chord are somewhat unusual in design. Finally, the hip verticals have an uncommon four-pronged eye detail at the connection to the bottom chord.
A June 2005 visit to this bridge revealed that a section of
this bridge's random rubble abutments has completely fallen away. Some stones
remain below this section and a couple stones remain above this section,
creating a hole in the abutment. The problem is that this hole appears to be
below the location of the northeast bearing, which would appear to put this
bridge at risk for eventual collapse due to abutment failure, even though as it
stands the truss superstructure is in pristine condition. Nothing would be more
devastating than to have a metal truss superstructure with such a high degree of
historic integrity and no major structural problems destroyed by defective
abutments.
Many of Michigan's pre-1910 are noted for having random rubble stone abutments. A far cry from the craftsmanship and quality construction of coursed ashlar abutments found in other states like Pennsylvania, Michigan's random rubble abutments are visually attractive looking, often composed of a variety of colorful stones of various shapes, but they are notoriously unstable due to the random shapes of the stones which rely heavily on mortar to maintain their integrity. They appear to have been constructed using whatever stones builders could find laying around the bridge site and perhaps in nearby farmer's fields. While attractive and a part of Michigan's heritage and identity, the historic significance of these stone abutments is limited and they do not outweigh the value of the metal truss bridge they support. If replacement of such abutments with modern concrete, and/or simply lifting the bridge off of the abutments and placing the bridge into storage is needed to protect the integrity of the truss, than this is what should be done.
In the case of the Martin Road Bridge, given the serious condition of the
abutments contrasted with the excellent condition of the truss superstructure,
HistoricBridges.org recommends that the truss should be lifted off of its
abutments and placed into storage to await reuse either in a new location or on
replacement abutments in its original location. In addition, by 2011, the county
road commission had decided to bring an end to allowing visitors to walk on the
deck of the bridge and they have installed "No Trespassing" signs and installed
cyclone fencing to prohibit access to the bridge. The road commission has
indicated they have no intention of spending money to repair and reopen the
bridge to pedestrians. However, Shiawassee County Road Commission has indicated
a willingness to entertain any proposal to transfer ownership of the bridge to a
third party for relocation and preservation. HistoricBridges.org is also happy
to assist any interested third party in learning more about the bridge and the
potential for any reuse of the bridge. It is assumed that any reuse of this
bridge would be for non-motorized traffic. This bridge would make a fantastic
and functional centerpiece to any non-motorized trail or path system.
HistoricBridges.org may also be able to guide any interested third party to
firms that work with historic bridge and likely would be able to restore this
bridge to like-new condition for pedestrian use at a cost similar to that of a
modern pedestrian bridge.
Note that when the county fenced off the bridge, they also removed the plaques. In the interest of ensuring that these publically owned artifacts from the bridge remained publicly owned (and not part of a road commission employee's private collection) HistoricBridges.org contacted the road commission to inquire about the status of the bridge plaques. The county road commission reports that the plaques are being stored at the county road commission facility. HistoricBridges.org has no objection to this, as the plaques were insecurely mounted to the bridge and at risk for theft. It is presumed that if a third party works out an agreement with the road commission to transfer ownership of the Martin Road Bridge for relocation, preservation, and reuse, that these plaques would also be made available to the third part so that they could be placed on the restored bridge.
About the Martin Road Bridge, From Michigan Historic Sites OnlineNarrative Description: Built in 1885, the Martin Road Bridge is a single-span, pin-connected, Pratt through truss structure, displaying nine panels, with dimensions of 119 feet in length and fifteen feet in width between the trusses. The three-by-eight-inch wooden planks forming the deck are supported by six rows of six-inch I-beams and two rows of six-inch channels carried on sixteen-inch built-up metal floor beams. Rubble fieldstone abutments support the bridge. The structure is currently closed to highway traffic. Statement of Significance: The Martin Road Bridge is one of the oldest metal through truss highway bridges in Michigan. The state's oldest surviving examples date from 1876 and fewer than a dozen such structures built prior to 1890 remain in the entire state. Built in 1885, the bridge is the only surviving through truss highway bridge in Michigan known to have been designed and constructed by the Mt. Vernon Bridge Company of Mt. Vernon, Ohio. The bridge is an excellent and increasingly rare example of late nineteenth-century bridge building. |
![]()
Click on a thumbnail or gallery name below to visit that particular photo gallery. If videos are available, click on a video name to view and/or download that particular video.
|
Structure Overview
Original / Full Size Photos |
A collection of overview photos that show the bridge as a whole and general areas of the bridge. For the best visual immersion and full detail, or for use as a desktop background, this gallery presents the photos for this bridge in the original digital camera resolution. |
|
Structure Details
Original / Full Size Photos |
A collection of detail photos that document the parts, construction, and condition of the bridge. For the best visual immersion and full detail, or for use as a desktop background, this gallery presents the photos for this bridge in the original digital camera resolution. |
|
Structure Overview
Mobile Optimized Gallery |
A collection of overview photos that show the bridge as a whole and general areas of the bridge. View the photos for this bridge in a reduced size which is useful for mobile/smartphone users, modem
(dial-up) users, or those who do not wish to wait for the longer
download times of the full-size photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer (great for mobile users) by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer |
|
Structure Details
Mobile Optimized Gallery |
A collection of detail photos that document the parts, construction, and condition of the bridge. View the photos for this bridge in a reduced size which is useful for mobile/smartphone users, modem
(dial-up) users, or those who do not wish to wait for the longer
download times of the full-size photos. Alternatively, view this photo gallery using a popup slideshow viewer (great for mobile users) by clicking the link below.
Browse Gallery With Popup Viewer |

© Copyright 2003-2013, HistoricBridges.org. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: HistoricBridges.org is a volunteer group of private citizens. HistoricBridges.org is NOT a government agency, does not represent or work with any governmental agencies, nor is it in any way associated with any government agency or any non-profit organization. While we strive for accuracy in our factual content, HistoricBridges.org offers no guarantee of accuracy. Information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Information could include technical inaccuracies or errors of omission. Opinions and commentary are the opinions of the respective HistoricBridges.org member who made them and do not necessarily represent the views of anyone else, including any outside photographers whose images may appear on the page in which the commentary appears. HistoricBridges.org does not bear any responsibility for any consequences resulting from the use of this or any other HistoricBridges.org information. Owners of bridges have the responsibility of correctly following all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, regardless of any HistoricBridges.org information.