

![]()
| Key Facts |
| Bridge Name | Facility Carried / Feature Intersected | Location | Structure Type | Construction Date / Builder or Contractor |
| Pomeroy-Mason bridge | Old US-33 Over Ohio River | Pomeroy and Mason: Meigs County, Ohio and Mason County, West Virginia | Metal Riveted Cantilever Through Truss, Stationary | 1928 By: Mount Vernon Bridge Company of Mount Vernon, Ohio |
| Technical Facts |
| Rehabilitation Date | Structure Length | Roadway Width | Main Spans | Approach Spans | Minimum Vertical Underclearance | Navigational Vertical Clearance |
| 1976 | 1848.1 Feet (563.3 Meters) | 20 Feet (6.1 Meters) | 3 | 13 Plate Girders | 17 Feet (5.16 Meters) Over Railroad | 79.1 Feet (24.1 Meters) Over Railroad |
This monstrous cantilever truss bridge is a magnificent structure that is historically significant as an excellent example of landmark cantilever construction, and includes features such as built-up members, rivets, and a complex network of bracing not seen in modern bridge construction. Also, because of the number of large rivers in the country, as well as the cost of bridging such large rivers, there is a very small total number of cantilever bridges in the United States compared to other bridge types, making each example more rare and significant.
The Pomeroy-Mason bridge is noted for its extensive network of trusses that are also covered in lattice and v-lacing creating an infinitely complex structure that is a beautiful work of geometric art. The bridge also has a shallow, graceful arch to its deck, that is more defined than in some other cantilever bridges. The bridge features an easily identified suspended span at the center. The suspended span of a cantilever bridge is that section of the bridge that is essentially a single-span truss bridge that is held over the water by the large cantilever arms that branch out from the towers over the bridge piers.
Meigs County, Ohio apparently thinks the new bridge will offer more for people to look at than the existing historic bridge. The county claims on their website that the new bridge "is expected to draw thousands of tourists to view the unique structure that will be both picturesque and efficient for traffic." This clearly represents a lack of awareness about the future of bridges. The historic Pomeroy-Mason Bridge may not be drawing "thousands of tourists" but it is drawing many. Historic Bridges of Michigan and Elsewhere is not the only bridge website including it. It is highly unlikely that the new bridge will ever draw "thousands of tourists" because the bridge is not unique as they claim. Indeed, numerous cable-stayed bridges have been built over the past decade, with many more planned or under construction. In contrast, the number of remaining pre-1950 cantilever bridges are dropping in number as they are replaced often by these cable-stayed bridges. Pre-1950 cantilever truss bridges offer much more in the way of beauty and historic value than cantilever bridges built after that date. Pre-1950 cantilever bridges offer riveted and pinned connections as well as built-up members and chords with attractive lattice and v-lacing. They offer unique variations in truss configuration and bridge shape, as engineers tried different ideas based on location, money, and research of the period. If the Pomeroy-Mason Bridge had instead been preserved, ten years from now it might be quite a rare attraction, with an extremely high level of historic value. Instead, the communities of Pomeroy and Mason will be left with a cable-stayed bridge which will most likely be quite a common structure ten years from now. Aside from variations on tower design, location, and number of towers, cable stayed bridges are usually quite plan in appearance. They often feature a simple concrete slab deck, simple concrete towers, and straight cables leading from concrete tower to concrete deck. While minimalist artists might appreciate this design, such a bridge does not offer the intricate geometric art that comes from a network of thousands of trusses. Everyone's opinion of beauty is different, but what is known for a fact is that the replacement Pomeroy-Mason Bridge will be anything but unique.
There has been nearly no efforts at genuine long-term preservation on the surviving pre-1950 cantilever bridges on the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers. The fate of bridges like the Pomeroy-Mason Bridge emphasize the need to preserve the dwindling number of remaining structures.
![]()
![]()
