Red Mill Bridge

Most Recent Visit To Bridge: August 2007

This bridge is extremely rare because it was built by an unusual bridge builder, the Variety Ironworks of Cleveland, Ohio that was apparently not as prolific as some companies since at most only a handful of documented examples of their work appear to remain in the country. The only other bridge currently on this website built by the company is the Maple Rapids Road Bridge in Michigan. The two bridges make a good comparison to identify some of the unusual details this company seemed to use. There are three main items of note. First, the top chord is a standard built-up box beam, but it has lattice on the top instead of the usual plate. Also, unusually, this design for the top chord is not the same on the end posts. End posts are generally the same in design as top chords on a particular bridge. The end post on these two Variety Bridge and Iron Works bridges do not feature the lattice on top and instead has the usual plate. Finally, the sway bracing is a unique design: a lightweight structural element that has a slightly triangular shape to it. Both bridges also feature built-up floor beams that also follow a triangular shape, although this sort of floor beam is not especially unusual for bridges from this period, although it is less common than having a rolled beams for floor beams. The two bridges do differ in that the Red Mill Bridge has a less ornate and more standard lattice design for a portal brace. Also, the Red Mill Bridge has unusual detail at the bottom chord connection at the hip vertical. There really isn't a connection there, and instead, there are just some unusual guides to hold the bottom chord in place.

Clearly, this is an unusual bridge and one of the last surviving examples of a small bridge company's work. This bridge must be preserved. If it is not feasible for it to be restored in place where it can continue to serve the light, rural residential traffic it has handled for the past 100 years, than it could be relocated elsewhere, perhaps for pedestrian use in a park. Perhaps Johnstown, which is a ways south of this bridge, could add this bridge to their rich collection of historic bridges. As the bridge stands, it is in need of restoration, with significant rust present on the bridge, although it is not yet suffered severe damage that would be difficult to correct with a routine restoration that paid attention to retaining historic integrity.

This bridge may be older than the c. 1895 date given by the historic bridge inventory. The Maple Rapids Road Bridge was from 1888, and this bridge looks like it could be from a date closer to that as well. Perhaps a c. 1890 date would be better.