If you want to save history and your heritage,

Save the Ulster Bridge

 

There are many reasons to like history; especially if it has to do with your own heritage. History is a powerful tool that makes us who we are today. Through knowing about our own heritage, we can learn from our ancestors, so that we can pass that knowledge down to the generations of the future. History has to do with our identity, tradition, way of thinking and everything that is associated with it. It can include our contribution to certain events in time. In terms of architecture, it can include our involvement in the construction of certain buildings with ornamental and geometrical designs, monuments commemorating important events, and in this case, a bridge whose history is connected to the people who built it.

There are many reasons to save the Ulster Bridge from its destruction because of its historic significance and its identity to the community of Ulster; especially to the ancestors who built this magnificent superstructure. From a point of view of a pontist who has yet to visit the bridge, here is a list of reasons why the bridge should not be torn down:

 

  1. Its technical details: The Bridge is a 4-span pin-connected Parker through truss bridge with Town-lattice portal bracings with curved heels and multi-rhombus strut bracings. Each Parker span is 237’-3”. The bridge also has 10 riveted Warren pony truss spans with vertical end posts, each with a span of 103’-4”. The total length of 2,011’-3” (613 meters) makes it one of the longest combination truss bridges built in Pennsylvania and the longest truss bridge still in operation.
  1. The bridge is associated with the Pennsylvania Steel Company of Steelton, which is located near the state capital, Harrisburg. The company was founded in 1865, with Samuel M. Felton being the first president. The company was the first in the USA to produce steel, with 4,116 tons produced in 1868. This amount of steel produced annually eventually skyrocketed to 460,000 tons by 1902. The company constructed steel to be used for railroads, skeletal frames for buildings (skyscrapers included) and of course, truss bridges. Like the railroad car company built by George Pullman in Chicago, the PA Steel Co. was responsible for the creation of the present-day city of Steelton, with the steel company being the nucleus of the community. Most of the buildings in Steelton constructed from 1880 on still exist today. PA Steel was bought by Bethlehem Steel Co. in 1916 but the plant continues its operations to this day. While it is unknown how many bridges the PA Steel Company constructed between 1865 and 1916, the Ulster Bridge, constructed in 1914, may be the last of the PA Steel Company bridges left in the state, which makes it even more important to save it.
  2. The bridge serves as the village’s main historic centerpiece. Each village in the county has its own icon that it can be proud of. Bradford County has a lot of treasures that are worth visiting. It has a historic community like Towanda, Minnequa Springs in Canton, Native American and French traditions that can be found throughout the county, and even a rare Burr-truss bridge made of wood in the Knapp’s Bridge at Luther Mills. There are some known metal truss bridges that exist in the county; some closed to traffic. But none of these metal truss bridges stand up to the colossal superstructure at Ulster, for it serves as the icon for the village of Ulster, which has a few houses, and industry and is served by a railroad and a pair of state highways. Given the historic value of the bridge, if it meets the wrecking ball, not only will the bridge be gone, but with it, the identity of the community.
  3. There are other alternatives to demolishing a piece of history without the worry of costs and liability. This includes leaving the bridge in place and converting it into some form of recreation, or if it is absolutely necessary, splitting the structure into individual spans and relocating them to areas that need a historic truss bridge like this one for their own purposes.

Even though the bridge is located in a very rural setting, it does not mean that it has to be demolished at any cost. There are some well-known examples of rare truss bridges in the country that exist in rural areas, many of them located in the state, including Venango Veterans Memorial Bridge in Venango Co., Foxburg Bridge in Clarion Co. and Hickory Bridge in Forest Co. All are located in rural settings. Unfortunately, like the Ulster Bridge, all are slated for demolition in the near future for reasons of age, structural obsoleteness, and maintenance issues. However, there are some well-known examples of bridges that were preserved in place, in the USA, and especially in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Many of these bridges were located in rural settings. One of the examples coming to mind includes the conversion of the Quaker Bridge in Mercer Co. into a picnic area. From where I originate in the Midwestern part of the country, there are many examples of these truss bridges, where newer structures were built nearby making them obsolete. Nevertheless, the structures were kept in place and renovated at an affordable cost. This includes the renovation of the Coffee Street Bridge in Lanesboro, MN and the preservation of Klondike Mill Bridge over the Big Sioux River at the SD/IA Border near Rock Rapids, IA. Given the size and historic significance of the structure, leaving the Ulster Bridge in place and renovating it for recreation purposes is probably the most viable option for the cost of renovating the superstructure is cheap and the village of Ulster can keep their centerpiece of pride in the community.

Even though the bridge is scheduled to be taken down once the new bridge is open, it is not too late to delay the demolition of the truss structure. There are many ways to contact people in order to express your interest in this structure. This includes contacting the PaDOT to express interest in buying the structure or convincing them to delay the demolition to allow time for others to step forward and claim the structure. The Susquehanna Valley Construction Corporation, which is currently building the new bridge, will take over the ownership of the bridge as soon as the newer structure is open to traffic, so it is also possible to contact the company to express interest. The more people involved in saving the Ulster Bridge, the more likely the bridge will be spared demolition. The contact details are listed at the end of the letter.

Remember, there are many reasons to save the Ulster Bridge. I have listed a few key reasons, but I am sure you have some reasons of your own. While some people would rather visit “thriller parks” such as Hershey Park near Harrisburg and Kennywood near Pittsburgh, others would rather visit places of natural or historic interest to escape modernization and live a simple and serene life for one day, (re-) visiting the past and imagining what life was like before freeways, and the likes of Disney and McDonald’s started dominating our way of life. The Ulster Bridge is one of those places that can take you back into the time when it was built and how it evolved around the village of Ulster. Many have memories of the bridge when growing up. Some even have memories of the steel company the built this bridge. The most important thing is these memories can still be revived today, if the structure stays standing. It is better to see history up close and in person than in books which will collect dust in the library or on monuments that are more likely to be ignored by passers-by.  Please allow the people who would rather witness history all over again than to visit the “thriller parks” to have their share of fun. You will do them and their future generations a great favor.

 

Jason D. Smith

Jena, Germany

 

Here are some links to the Ulster Bridge and its history, in case if you want to know more about it.

 

Nathan Holth has a wonderful write-up and photos about the bridge. His link is as follows:

http://www.historicbridges.org/pennsylvania/ulster/index.htm

Note: His website includes some of the PA bridge examples I mentioned in the letter.

 

History of the PA Steel Company in detail can be found here:

http://maley.net/dauphin/OnlineData/geographic/steelton.htm

 

Information on the Klondike Mill and Coffee Street Bridge along with photos taken by me can be found here:

http://www.bridgehunter.com/ia/lyon/klondike/ (Note: Bridge is still standing; photos were taken in 1998)

http://www.bridgehunter.com/mn/fillmore/coffee-street/  (Note: Information on the renovation of the bridge can be found here: http://www.lanesboro.com/lanesboro-city.html )

 

If you are interested in claiming and preserving the Ulster Bridge, please contact the following recipients:

Kara Russell

Cultural Resources Specialist

PaDOT

Bureau of Design

Environmental Quality Assurance Division

PO Box 3790

Harrisburg, PA 17105

717-705-1484

E-mail: krussell@state.pa.us

 

Contractor for the Ulster Bridge Replacement Project:

Susquehanna Valley Construction Corporation

175 Lamont Street

New Cumberland, PA 17070

 

PS, If you want a couple more incentives to save the Ulster, where I’m living in Jena, we have three bridges that are either being restored at the time of this writing or have been restored to their original form. Some of them date as far back as the 1400s. Some information on the bridges and the photos  can be found here:

 

Burgauer Wehr Bridge (built 1544; destroyed in 1945; restored in 2004 after 7 years of renovation):

http://en.structurae.de/structures/data/index.cfm?ID=s0010477

 

Camsdorfer Bridge (built ca. 1400, rebuilt 1912 and again in 1945; renovated 2005):

http://en.structurae.de/structures/data/index.cfm?ID=s0010450

 

Saaletal Viaduct (built 1938; being renovated at the moment as part of the plan to widen the German Autobahn):

 

http://en.structurae.de/structures/data/index.cfm?ID=s0006240