
![]()
|
Key Facts |
Bridge Name |
Type | Road | Location | City | Crossing |
| Cochranton Bridge | Truss | Adams Street (SR-173) | Crawford County, MI | Cochranton | French Creek |
|
Technical Facts |
|
Construction Date |
Structure Length | Deck Width | Contractor |
| 1930 | 315 Feet | 33 Feet | Alex C. Bailey of Philipsburg, Pennsylvania |
This is a two-span through Parker truss. Although Pennsylvania's massive-membered through truss bridges appear to have been built to a standard plan, they all manage to be different. This bridge does not have v-lacing on the diagonals. The heavy lattice portals on the bridge have been hit by a truck that was a bit too tall. Original lattice pedestrian guardrails remain on the bridge. Judging by the good condition of the corrugated steel that forms the base of the deck, I would guess that the deck of this bridge has been redone once. This bridge forms a nice gateway in or out of Cochranton. As is mentioned on Daniel's Disappearing Bridges website, this bridge would look nice in the sun with its rust/paint combination. But I am worried that the obvious lack of maintenance, which is leading to the bridge rusting, means that the bridge is going to be demolished.
Information and Findings From Pennsylvania's Historic Bridge InventoryDiscussion of Bridge The 1930, two span, 315'-long, riveted Parker thru truss bridge is supported on concrete abutments and a concrete pier. The trusses are composed of built up members. The bridge has no innovative or distinctive details. Built to a state highway department standard design, it is an undistinguished example of a common technology. Riveted truss bridges had been built in the state since the 1890s. Neither the bridge nor its setting is historically or technologically significant. Discussion of Surrounding Area The bridge carries a 2 lane road and sidewalk over a stream in a sparsely developed, undistinguished area of early and mid 20th century houses. The setting does not have historic district potential. Bridge Considered Historic By Survey: No |
![]()
![]()
